The Use of Authentic Language Data to Develop Communicative Competence
Hélade Scutti Santos presents how the use of authentic language data develops communicative competence. Powerpoint Download Learn more about Santos
Bridging Research and Practice
Professional Development Resources for L2 Teaching and Learning
Hélade Scutti Santos presents how the use of authentic language data develops communicative competence. Powerpoint Download Learn more about Santos
Luziris Pineda Turi & Aymara Boggiano discuss connecting textbooks to authentic data. Connecting Textbooks to Authentic Data Learn more about Turi Learn more about Boggiano
Kevin García Cruz (CLIC, Rice University): 1) introduces and discusses his approach to teaching conversational features in the L2 classroom, which includes: a reflection on language usage in the students’ L1; a contrastive analysis of L1 and L2 conversation closing sequences; an analysis
Micheline Chalhoub-Deville (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA) – Over the years, representations of the L2 testing construct have remained primarily cognitive in their underpinnings. The instability of performance across tasks, which is empirically supported by task specificity findings
Eric Hauser (University of Electro-communications, Japan, and University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, USA) focuses on one instance of Japanese interaction in which one of the participants, an L2 user of Japanese, is constructed by other participants (L1 Japanese users) as
Numa Markee (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) uses transcripts of classroom interaction and various classroom materials as the empirical point of departure for a practical discussion of “doing interactional competence” and addresses a number of theoretical points in the applied
Hansun Waring (Teachers College, Columbia University) discusses on specific areas of turn-taking, sequencing, overall structuring, and repair that may be amenable to instruction geared towards lower-level learners of ESL. Learn more about Waring
Meng Yeh (CLIC, Rice University) discusses on the steps that lead to establishing learning outcomes that are achievable for first year L2 Chinese students and the assessment procedures, both formative and summative, that were adopted to monitor the students’ progress
Katharina Kley (CLIC, Rice University) discusses (1) making students aware that minimal expansions occur in both English and German; (2) having students identify minimal expansions in authentic English and German interactions, and contrast and compare expansions in both languages; and
Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm (Ohio State University): 1) presents an empirical study of L2 learners’ development of IC in German; 2) discusses the importance of learning L2 response tokens in developing IC; 3) shows that L2 response tokens should be explicitly taught to L2 learners.
Maryam Emami and Hélade Scutti Santos (CLIC, Rice University): 1) introduce their approach to assessing first year L2 learners’ interactional competence; 2) provide examples of activities and assessments used in their program; 3) present a sample rubric for assessing IC
Part 1. Simona Pekarek Doehler (University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland): 1) introduces the concept of interactional competence (IC); 2) discusses why we study and research IC; 3) presents the relevant concerns for exploring IC in second languages; 4) addresses challenges for research-based
Olcay Sert (Hacettepe University, Turkey): 1) defines the practice of active listenership, 2) illustrates the development of students’ ability to produce collaborative turn completions, and 3) discusses the potential pedagogical implications of these findings. Learn more about Sert
On competence and intersubjective agency: A post-cognitive perspective – Numa Markee